?

Log in

No account? Create an account
A Wank-Free Zone's Journal
 
[Most Recent Entries] [Calendar View] [Friends View]

Wednesday, March 21st, 2007

Time Event
2:47p
Welcome to the Community!
I'm assuming you've read the profile by now, but if not, please do so. There are a few ground rules of which everyone should be aware.

This community is in need of an icon, so if anyone out there with mad photoshop skillz feels like having a go, please do! If we get enough submissions, perhaps we could have a vote.

Finally, if anyone feels like helping a mod out by becoming a co-mod, drop me a line.

From the sound of things, several of you already have topics of conversation in mind. Let's get posting! :)


Your friendly neighborhood mod,
nobleplatypus

Current Mood: hopeful
5:44p
(This is something I've been thinking about for a while.)

Once upon a time, Jane Austen wrote novels that were part satire, part romance, and 100% asexual in content. These were the penny novels, so to speak, of the time (from what I hear; correct me if I'm wrong, people).


When reading these novels, do you think people were more focused on the emotional, courtly love style of romance that these novels portrayed, or were they mentally translating it into sex? What I mean, I suppose, is: Do you think people in earlier centuries were less sexual or just more repressed (or, as a third option, more polite about it)?

When I read, say, Pride and Prejudice, what strikes me most is the social humor.

(This can be broader than Jane Austen, obviously; she's just what I thought of.)

(Inform me if this is an inappropriate topic. I'm not certain what is acceptable here and what's not.)

Current Mood: chipper

<< Previous Day 2007/03/21
[Calendar]
Next Day >>
About LiveJournal.com